Petition for intervention and challenge to certain orders was considered. Court declined to issue notice on specific orders, finding no infirmity. Notice was issued for another order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 27 wp 1501-2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO.1501/2024
Kashinath Sundraji Chaudhary
Vs.
Mahadeorao Tulsidas Mahalle and others
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
CORAM : SMT. M.S. JAWALKAR, J. DATED : 07/03/2024
After hearing the petitioner, I am not inclined to issue notice in respect of challenge to the order below Exhibit 34 and order below Exhibit 10, the application for intervention and for placing documents on record. As the applicant has extended for no objection for intervention, there is no infirmity in the order passed below Exhibit 34 and Exhibit 10. As such, I do not see any reason to interfere with the order passed below Exhibit 34 and Exhibit 10.
JUDGE
R.S. Sahare
Signed by: Mrs. Ranjana Sahare Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 07/03/2024 15:51:06
Kashinath Sundraji Chaudhary
Mahadeorao Tulsidas Mahalle
M.S. Jawalkar
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
