Writ petition challenged a Lok Adalat award in a specific performance suit passed on consent terms. The petitioner claimed the earnest money was refunded earlier and that he signed the consent terms misled. The court found he was not illiterate and declined to interfere.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-NAG:8816
39-cwp-62-24.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH: NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 62 OF 2024
Kishor B. Bhute ...Petitioner Versus Prashant P. Bhende ...Respondent
Mr. R.D. Hajare for the Petitioner. Mr. A. S. Dhore for the Respondent.
CORAM : N. R. BORKAR, J. DATE : 1.8.2024.
PC:-
. This petition takes exception to the award dated 13.8.2022 passed by Lok Adalat in Special Civil Suit No. 10 of 2019.
1/2
Dinesh S. Sherla
39-cwp-62-24.doc
terms as he was mislead. In support of submission, the learned counsel for the petitioner has drawn my attention to the bank statement annexed to the petition. It is submitted that the award passed by Lok Adalat thus be quashed and the suit be restored.
(N.R. BORKAR, J.)
2/2
Dinesh S. Sherla
Signed by: S.S. Wadkar (SSW) Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 12/08/2024 16:41:17
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Lok Adalat award based on consent terms could be interfered with on the claim that the petitioner was misled about refund of the earnest amount.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kishor B. Bhute
Prashant P. Bhende
N. R. Borkar
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
