Disposed

Superior Aircorn Private Limited v. union of india

Bombay HC30 Aug 2024ARBP/307/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petition under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act seeking extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate to publish its award. The court found sufficient progress had been made and allowed the petition, extending time by one month from the date of uploading the order.

What did the court decide?

One month extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate from the date of uploading the order, in terms of prayer clause (a).

Superior Aircorn Private Limited vs union of india — Arbitration | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

1 26-ARBP (L) 25648-24-modified.doc

¶2

Digitally signed by MUGDHA MUGDHA MANOJ MANOJ PARANJAPE PARANJAPE Date: 2024.10.01 10:56:13 +0530

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

¶4

ARBITRATION PETITION (L) NO.25648 OF 2024

¶5

Superior Aircorn Private Limited … Petitioner V/s. Union of India … Respondent

¶6

Mr. Udaya Sankar Samudrala a/w Sujit Upadhyay for the Petitioner. Ms. Siddhi Vadake i/by Bharat Mehta for the Respondent.

¶7

CORAM : ARIF S. DOCTOR, J. DATE : 30TH AUGUST 2024

¶8

P.C. :

¶9

This is a Petition filed under Section 29A of the Arbitration and

¶10

Conciliation Act, 1996 for extension of the mandate of the arbitral tribunal.

¶11

I am informed that the arbitral award is ready and it is for this purpose that the extension is sought for.

¶12

Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondent initially opposed the grant of extension of time. She then however submitted that if time was to be extended to, further arguments should not be advanced. In the event,

¶13

This order is modified/corrected as per order dated 30th September 2024. Mugdha

¶14

1 of 2

¶15

2 26-ARBP (L) 25648-24-modified.doc

¶16

if any further arguments are to be advanced, it is always open to the Respondent to object the same before the Tribunal.

¶17

Therefore, I am satisfied that sufficient progress has been made. In view of the above, I deem it fit to allow the present Petition. Thus, the present Petition is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a), which reads as under :

¶18

“(a) this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to grant the extension of time for a period of One month from the date of passing of the Order by this Hon'ble Court and / or up to 3lSt August, 2024 for concluding the Arbitration Proceedings and publication of Arbitration Award in respect of the disputes between the Petitioner and the Respondents;”

¶19

I make it clear that this extension of time is granted only for a period of one month from the date on which this order is being uploaded.

¶20

The Arbitration Petition is thus disposed of.

¶21

(ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.)

¶22

This order is modified/corrected as per order dated 30th September 2024. Mugdha

¶23

2 of 2

Superior Aircorn Private Limited v. union of india

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Superior Aircorn Private Limited v. union of india

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Idbi Bank Ltd. vs Edelweiss Rural and Corporate Services Limited

Manish Sheth vs Ketan Sheth

Mygate (Vivish Technologies Pvt. Ltd. vs Money Control (E-Eighteen.Com Limited)

Mrs Moushami Amit Bajaj and Others vs M/S Kamalashri Builders and Others

Vir Krishna Kotak vs Hl Terminal Holding B.V.

Superior Aircorn Private Limited vs union of india