Suit disposed of after plaintiff's counsel stated, in view of a prior statement recorded on 19 August 2024, that nothing survived in the suit; refund of court fees permitted per Rules under Section 43 of the Maharashtra Court Fees Act.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 M4-S-176-2024.doc
Digitally signed by MULEY MULEY SHUBHAM SHUBHAM PRAVINRAO PRAVINRAO Date: 2024.08.29 18:06:01 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
SUIT NO. 176 OF 2024
MyGate (Vivish Technologies Pvt. Ltd.)
...Plaintiff
Vs.
Money Control (E-Eighteen.com Limited)
...Defendant
Adv. Dharam Jumani a/w Rohan Mathur and Pulkit Dhawan i/by Anoma Law Group LLP for the Plaintiff.
Adv. Zulfiquar Memon a/w Mrinal Bharti, Abhishek Gupta, Poornima Eapen and Keerthi Kamath i/by MZM Legal LLP for the Defendant.
CORAM : ARIF S. DOCTOR, J. DATE : 29TH AUGUST, 2024
P.C.:-
1/2
Shubham
2 M4-S-176-2024.doc
(ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.)
2/2
Shubham
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Money Control (E-Eighteen.com Limited)
Arif S. Doctor
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
