Allowed

Shaikh Abdul Rehman S/O Shaikh Abdul Qayyum and Others v. the State of Maharashtra and Another

Bombay HC14 Jun 2024APPLN/4455/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal application filed under Section 482 CrPC, the Bombay High Court bench at Aurangabad allowed the quashing of an FIR and charge-sheet based on the parties' submission that the dispute had been amicably settled. Costs were imposed.

What did the court decide?

Application quashing FIR and Charge-sheet allowed subject to payment of Rs. 10,000 costs to High Court Bar Library.

Shaikh Abdul Rehman S/O Shaikh Abdul Qayyum and… — Matrimonial and Divorce | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

2024:BHC-AUG:10825-DB

¶2

1 927APPLN4455.2023.odt

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶4

927 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4455 OF 2023

¶5

Shaikh Abdul Rehman S/o Shaikh Abdul Qayyum And Others
VERSUS

¶6

The State Of Maharashtra And Another

¶7

Mr. Deshmukh Saud Ahemad N A - Advocate for Applicant
Mrs. V. N. Patil – Jadhav - APP for Respondent/State

¶8

CORAM : R. G. AVACHAT
 AND
NEERAJ P. DHOTE, JJ.

¶9

DATED : 14TH JUNE, 2024

¶10

PER COURT : -

¶11

1.This is the Application filed under Section 482 of the Code
of Criminal Procedure for quashing the First Information Report and the
Charge-sheet No. 8/23 in Crime No. 474/2021 registered with MIDC
CIDCO Police Station, Aurangabad City, as RCC No. 859 of 2023
pending before the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Aurangabad
for the offence punishable under Section 294-b, 506 r/w 34 of the
Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the Muslim Women (Protection of
Rights on Marriage) Act.

¶12

2.Informant and the Applicants-accused are present before
the Court. The Advocate for the Applicants and the Informant are
present before the Court. They submit that the parties have amicably

¶13

2 927APPLN4455.2023.odt settled the dispute. They further submit that the initial crime registered against the Applicants for the offence punishable under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code has been quashed by this Court with the consent of the parties. They submit that, in view of the amicable settlement, this application be allowed.

¶14

3. Learned APP opposes the application.

¶15

4.In view of the categorical submission of the parties who are
personally present in the Court, the Application is allowed in terms of
prayer clause ‘C)’ subject to payment of costs of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten
Thousand) to be paid to the High Court Bar Library, Aurangabad. The
costs be deposited within two (2) weeks.

¶16

5. Application is accordingly disposed of.

¶17

 [NEERAJ P. DHOTE] [R. G. AVACHAT]
 JUDGE JUDGE

¶18

SG Punde

¶19

Signed by: Sandeep Gulabrao Punde Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 14/06/2024 18:47:13

Shaikh Abdul Rehman S/O Shaikh Abdul Qayyum and Others v. the State of Maharashtra and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shaikh Abdul Rehman S/O Shaikh Abdul Qayyum and Others v. the State of Maharashtra and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajesh S/O. Dudhram Uke Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Rajendra Shivaji Avhad Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Satyam Suresh Kankariya and Other Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Shrirang S/O Manikrao Rakshe and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Satish Shankarao Shinde Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Pranaykumar Jawaharlal Jain Vs State of Maharashtra and Others