In Criminal Appeal No. 122 of 2024, the court quantified legal aid fees for counsel representing respondent nos. 2 and 3 at Rs. 10,000/- and noted attendance. The order does not mention a decision on the appeal merits.
Fees of Rs. 10,000/- quantified for counsel representing respondent nos. 2 and 3.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APEAL-122-24.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 122 OF 2024
Rajesh Dudhram Uke ..APPELLANT VERSUS
State of Maharashtra and Others
..RESPONDENTS
Mr. M.A. Tandale, Advocate for appellant (appointed through Legal Aid) Mrs. S.N. Deshmukh, A.P.P. for respondent no.1 – State Mrs. N.I. Deshmukh, Advocate for respondent nos. 2 and 3 (appointed)
CORAM : R.G. AVACHAT AND NEERAJ P. DHOTE, JJ DATE : 13th JUNE, 2024
PER COURT :
Fees of Mrs. N.I. Deshmukh, learned counsel appointed to represent Respondent Nos. 2 and 3, is quantified to Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand).
( NEERAJ P. DHOTE, J. ) ( R.G. AVACHAT, J. )
SSD
1 / 1
Rajesh Dudhram Uke
State of Maharashtra
Others
R.G. Avachat
Neeraj P. Dhote
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
