Application under Section 482 CrPC sought quashing of an FIR. The applicant had since been acquitted in the crime in question, and the acquittal order was placed on record. The court disposed of the application as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AUG:10826-DB
1 932APPLN1795.2020.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
932 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1795 OF 2020
Pranaykumar Jawaharlal Jain
VERSUS
State Of Maharashtra And Others
Mr. Gajendra D. Jain - Advocate for Applicant
Mr. A. D. Wange - APP for Respondent/State
CORAM : R. G. AVACHAT
AND
NEERAJ P. DHOTE, JJ.
DATED : 14TH JUNE, 2024
PER COURT : -
1.This Application is filed under Section 482 of the Code of
Criminal Procedure for quashing the First Information Report.
2.It is submitted by the learned advocate for the Applicant
that the Applicant was tried by the learned trial Court and he has been
acquitted in the said Crime which was sought to be quashed. He places
on record the copy of the order of the acquittal.
3.In view of the above, the Application stands disposed of as
infructuous.
[NEERAJ P. DHOTE] [R. G. AVACHAT]
JUDGE JUDGE
SG Punde
Signed by: Sandeep Gulabrao Punde Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 14/06/2024 18:49:05
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the FIR should be quashed under Section 482 CrPC when the applicant has already been acquitted in the underlying crime.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Pranaykumar Jawaharlal Jain
State Of Maharashtra
R. G. Avachat
Neeraj P. Dhote
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court