Kutubuddin Johrali Bhopali v. Th State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Anticipatory bail application in which the applicant claimed false implication and that he was not named in the FIR. The State sought adjournment as the investigating officer was absent and undertook that the applicant would not be arrested till the next date.
What did the court decide?
Applicant not to be arrested till 17 December 2024; matter adjourned.
What the court decided
Digitally signed by CHITRA CHITRA SANJAY SANJAY SONAWANE SONAWANE Date: 2024.12.10 20:19:51 +0530
Chitra Sonawane 906-aba-3362-2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Anticipatory Bail Application No.3362 of 2024
Kutubuddin Johrali Bhopali …... Applicant.
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra …... Respondent.
Mr Viral Mukte a/w Vishnu Wani i/by Arun Rajput for the applicant.
Mr Yogesh Dabke, APP for respondent/State.
Coram : R.N.Laddha, J. Date : 10 December 2024.
P.C. :
Learned Counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. The police official without any enquiry with the complainant directly registered the FIR. The applicant is not named in the FIR.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Kutubuddin Johrali Bhopali
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
Coram
R. N. Laddha
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
8 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court