Padmasinh Bajirao Patil v. Central Bureau Investigation and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Criminal revision challenging the trial court's refusal to allow examination of 19 police witnesses in a trial expedited by the Supreme Court. The court heard submissions of both sides and stood the matter over for further hearing.
What the court decided
9 REVN 420 of 2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 420 OF 2024
Dr. Padmasinh Bajirao Patil ...Applicant
vs.
Central Bureau of Investigation and Anr.
...Respondents
Sr. Advocate Mr. Girish Kulkarni Advocates for Applicant. a/w. Mr. Madhusudhan Parikh, Mr. Bhushan Mahadik, Ms. Pallavi Pukale, Ms. Nikita Pawar i/b. Mahadik & Associates :- Mr. Kuldeep S. Patil a/w. Mr. Advocate for Respondent No.1Ashish Kumar Srivastava :- CBI. Mr. A. S. Gawai :- APP for Respondent No. 2-State.
CORAM : S. M. MODAK, J.
DATE : 26th AUGUST 2024
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Dr. Padmasinh Bajirao Patil
- respondent
Central Bureau of Investigation
- respondent
State
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
10 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court