Rajkumar Amarchand Chugh v. State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Applicant in anticipatory bail application, a senior citizen accused of receiving brokerage and introducing co-accused, offered to deposit Rs.50,000 to show bonafides; State assured no arrest till next date if he cooperates with investigation.
What did the court decide?
No arrest till next date per State assurance; applicant to attend police station as required and deposit Rs.50,000 within two weeks; matter adjourned to 22 October 2024.
What the court decided
Digitally signed by CHITRA CHITRA SANJAY SANJAY SONAWANE SONAWANE Date: 2024.09.12 22:09:57 +0530
Chitra Sonawane 905-ABA-2552-2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Anticipatory Bail Application No.2552 of 2024
... Rajkumar Amarchand Chugh Applicant. Vs. The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent.
Mr Prerak Choudhary a/w JS Shukla a/w Ms Anisha Balse i/by Mr Prerak Choudhary for the applicant.
Mr Amit Palkar, APP for Respondent/State.
PSI Prashant Malvde a/w PSI SL Doke, Borivali Police Station, are present.
Coram : R.N.Laddha, J. Date : 12 September 2024.
P.C. :
Learned Counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant, a senior citizen, received a brokerage of Rs.50,000/- directly from the complainant. To show his bonafides, the applicant is willing to deposit Rs.50,000/- in the Court. The only role attributed to the applicant is that he introduced the co-accused, who accepted the alleged amount. Furthermore, the learned APP, based on instructions from the investigating officer present in the Court, assures that the applicant will not be arrested in the present crime till next date, provided he should co-operate with the investigation.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Rajkumar Amarchand Chugh
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
Coram
R.N. Laddha
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
10 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court