Jay Mukesh Mehta v. State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Anticipatory bail application adjourned at the applicant's request to a fixed date as last chance; the court clarified no interim protection operates in favour of the applicant.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Mamta Kale
18-aba-2973-2024.docx
MAMTAAMARKALE Digitallysigned byMAMTAAMARKALEDate:2024.12.1714:45:49+0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Anticipatory Bail Application No. 2973 of 2024
Jay Mukesh Mehta … Applicant
versus
The State of Maharashtra … Respondent
Mr J S Hegde, for the applicant.
Mr Arfan Sait, APP, for the respondent/ State. PSI Salunkhe, Borivali Police Station, Mumbai, is present.
Coram: R.N. Laddha, J. Date: 17 December 2024
P.C.:
. The learned counsel for the applicant seeks an adjournment. At the request of learned counsel for the applicant, stand over to 9 January 2025, as a last chance.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Jay Mukesh Mehta
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
Coram
R.N. Laddha
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
6 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court