In an interim application pending an anticipatory bail petition, the High Court directed the applicant to appear for interrogation by the investigating officer at the Sakinaka Police Station between November 11 and 18, 2024, before coercive steps are taken.
Direction to appear for interrogation and not tamper with evidence.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WAKLE MANOJ JANARDHAN
Digitally signed by WAKLE MANOJ JANARDHAN Date: 2024.11.08 19:06:42 +0530
Manoj 7-ABA-3017-2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.3017 OF 2024
Hemant Kumar Thakur …. Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra …. Respondent
WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.4653 OF 2024 IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.3017 OF 2024
Dipak Shantaram Chavan …. Complainant
In the matter between :-
Hemant Kumar Thakur ….. Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra …. Respondent
Mr. Subhash Jha a/w Mr. Siddharth Jha, Mr. Ashish Saxena & Mr. Deepesh Sahani i/by Law Global for the Applicant in ABA/3017/2024. Smt. Ranjana Humane, APP for the State. Ms.Poonam Bapuji Ruge, API, Sakinaka Police Station is present.
CORAM : SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J. DATED : 8th NOVEMBER, 2024 (VACATION COURT)
P.C. :-
No.4653 of 2024.
Learned A.P.P. waives service of notice for the Respondent-State.
1/2
Manoj 7-ABA-3017-2024.doc
(SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J.)
2/2
Hemant Kumar Thakur
State of Maharashtra
Shyam C. Chandak
As recorded by the court registry
8 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
