Disposed

Dipak Shantaram Chavan v. State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC8 Nov 2024IA/4653/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The applicant sought anticipatory bail. The court directed the applicant to attend before the Investigating Officer at Sakinaka Police Station between 11th and 18th November 2024 without coercive steps, subject to conditions against tampering with evidence or influencing witnesses. The matter is stayed for further hearing.

What did the court decide?

Ad-interim protection from arrest directed; applicant to attend investigation; matter stayed to 21st November 2024.

Dipak Shantaram Chavan vs State of Maharashtra — Anticipatory Bail | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

WAKLE MANOJ JANARDHAN

¶2

Digitally signed by WAKLE MANOJ JANARDHAN Date: 2024.11.08 19:06:42 +0530

¶3

Manoj 7-ABA-3017-2024.doc

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶5

ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.3017 OF 2024

¶6

Hemant Kumar Thakur …. Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra …. Respondent

¶7

WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.4653 OF 2024 IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.3017 OF 2024

¶8

Dipak Shantaram Chavan …. Complainant

¶9

In the matter between :-

¶10

Hemant Kumar Thakur ….. Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra …. Respondent

¶11

Mr. Subhash Jha a/w Mr. Siddharth Jha, Mr. Ashish Saxena & Mr. Deepesh Sahani i/by Law Global for the Applicant in ABA/3017/2024. Smt. Ranjana Humane, APP for the State. Ms.Poonam Bapuji Ruge, API, Sakinaka Police Station is present.

¶12

CORAM : SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J. DATED : 8^th NOVEMBER, 2024 (VACATION COURT)

¶13

P.C. :-

¶14

. Heard learned Advocate for respective parties.

¶15

1. None present for the Complainant in Interim Application

¶16

No.4653 of 2024.

¶17

1. Issue notice to the Respondent-State, returnable forthwith.

¶18

Learned A.P.P. waives service of notice for the Respondent-State.

¶19

1/2

¶20

Manoj 7-ABA-3017-2024.doc

¶21

Learned Advocate Mr.Jha for the Applicant submits that, Mr.Ratnesh Choudhary, co-accused in the same crime has been granted an ad-interim bail vide order dated 29^th October, 2024 in Anticipatory Bail Application (Stamp) No.22852 of 2024. He submits that, the Applicant is ready to attend before the Investigating Officer for investigation purpose as may be directed by this Court.

¶22

The Investigating Officer Ms. Poonam Ruge, API attached to Sakinaka Police Station through learned APP made a statement that, she will interrogate the Applicant if he attends the police station from 11^th to 18^th November, 2024 and in that event, she will not take coercive steps against the Applicant, till the next date.

¶23

In view thereof, the Applicant shall attend the Investigating Officer i.e. Ms.Poonam Ruge, API from 11^th to 18^th November 2024, between 12 noon to 4.00 pm at Sakinaka Police Station.

¶24

The Applicant shall not tamper with prosecution evidence and not to influence any of the witnesses of the offence.

¶25

1. Stand over to 21^st November, 2024.

¶26

All concerned to act on an authenticated or digitally signed copy of this order.

¶27

(SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J.)

¶28

2/2

Dipak Shantaram Chavan v. State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dipak Shantaram Chavan v. State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Dinesh Baburao Parab vs the State of Maharashtra

Sharanik Babagouda Kenchagouda vs State of Maharashtra

Ratnesh Kumar Baidyanath Chaudhary vs the State of Maharashtra

Hemant Kumr Thakur vs State of Maharashtra

Continental Hiring Co. vs Simplex Infrastructure Ltd.

Ramesh Harakchand Gada and Anr. vs State of Maharashtra