Dharmesh Bhuchhda v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Anticipatory bail application in which the applicant is exploring settlement; police undertake not to arrest the applicant until the next date; matter adjourned.
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Mamta Kale
21-aba-2842-2024.docx
Digitally signed byMAMTA AMARKALEDate: 2024.12.1218:25:52 +0530MAMTAAMARKALE
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Anticipatory Bail Application No. 2842 of 2024
Dharmesh Bhuchhda … Applicant
versus
The State of Maharashtra and Anr. … Respondents
Mr Gaurav Bhawnani, for the applicant. Mr Amit A Palkar, APP, for the respondent/ State. Mr Gaurav Parkar, for respondent No.2.
Coram: R.N. Laddha, J. Date: 12 December 2024.
P.C.:
. The learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is exploring the possibility of settlement.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Dharmesh Bhuchhda
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
- respondent
Respondent No. 2
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
8 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court