Anticipatory bail application stood over to a later date due to the arguing counsel's personal difficulty, with interim relief continuing until the next hearing.
Interim relief granted earlier continued to operate till the next date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Digitally signed by SMITA SMITA JOHNSONGONSALVES JOHNSON GONSALVESDate: 2024.10.21 15:49:14+0530
13.aba2270-24.doc
sg
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Anticipatory Bail Application No.2270 of 2024
With
Interim Application No.4340 of 2024 In
Anticipatory Bail Application No.2270 of 2024
Mohammad Sharique Mohammad Sabir Shaikh... Applicant
v/s.
State of Maharashtra
... Respondent
Ms Pooja Satpute, i/b. Tuushar Sonawane, for the Applicant. Mr Arfan Sait, APP, for Respondent State.
Mr Maghshyam Kocharekar, for Respondent No.2.
PSI SI Gaikwad, Shantinagar Police Station, Bhiwandi, is present.
Coram : R.N. Laddha, J. Date : 17 October 2024
P.C. :
. Since the learned arguing Counsel for the applicant is in personal difficulty, as reported, stand over to 24 October 2024 , as a last chance. Interim relief granted earlier shall continue to operate till the next date.
(R.N. Laddha, J.)
Page 1 of 1
17 October 2024
Mohammad Sharique Mohammad Sabir Shaikh
State of Maharashtra
R.N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
5 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
