Durgappa @ Rajabhau Narsu Waghmode v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Anticipatory bail application adjourned as the investigating officer was absent; State and respondent No.2 assured no arrest till the next date.
What the court decided
38-aba-2851-2024.docx
Mamta Kale
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Anticipatory Bail Application No. 2851 of 2024
Durgappa @ Rajabhau Narsu Waghmode … Applicant versus
The State of Maharashtra and Anr. … Respondents
Mr Amit Icham, for the Applicant. Mr Yogesh Dabke, APP, for the respondent/ State. Mr Ram Takle, for respondent No.2.
CHITRASANJAYSONAWANE Digitallysigned byCHITRASANJAYSONAWANEDate:2024.11.1818:00:36+0530
Coram: R.N. Laddha, J.
Date: 18 November 2024
P.C.:
. The learned APP seeks an adjournment as the investigating officer is not present and assures the Court that the applicant will not be arrested in the present crime till the next date. The learned counsel for respondent No.2 also seeks an adjournment as the arguing counsel is not present.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Durgappa @ Rajabhau Narsu Waghmode
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
Coram
R.N. Laddha
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
7 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court