Rohit Arun Mane v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail application listed for hearing; the State sought time to intimate the victim. The court adjourned the matter.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
20-ba-1185-2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.1185 OF 2024
Rohit Arun Mane ... Applicant
V/s.
State of Maharashtra … Respondent
Mr. Satyavrat Joshi I.by Mr. Ashish Vemekar, for the applicant. Mr. Sameer Mangaonkar, APP, for the Respondent / State.
Digitally
signed by
VARSHA
VARSHA DEEPAK
DEEPAK GAIKWAD
GAIKWAD Date:
2024.09.18
14:57:39
+0530
CORAM : ANIL S. KILOR, J. DATE : 18TH SEPTEMBER, 2024.
PC:
- The learned APP seeks time to give intimation to the victim.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Rohit Arun Mane
- respondent
State of Maharashtra
Coram
Anil S. Kilor
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
24 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Dhanaji Gopal Gage and Anr. Vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Sumitomo Chemical India Ltd. through Its Manager Mr. Anil Khandagale and Anr. Vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Mr. Iqbal Ebrahim Khan Vs Anutej Construction Pvt. Ltd.
Ismail Haroon Malkani Vs Joseph Dsouza Thr. Poa.Mr. Shaukat Ali Abdul Karim Shaikh