Kisor Ramdas Fatpure v. the State of Maharashtra and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Adjournment-only order (file 'paucity II.odt'), Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, Justice R. M. Joshi, dated 04/10/2024. Over fifty listed matters could not be heard for paucity of time and were adjourned to 11, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18 October 2024: 26 Anticipatory Bail Applications of 2024 (Nos. 1132, 1144, 1177, 1178, 1180, 1198, 1214, 1205, 1264, 1277, 1615, 1320, 1329, 1344, 1365, 1367, 1402, 1421, 1447, 1474, 1479, 1480, 1502, 1538, 1585, 1602, several 'WITH' connected Criminal Applications 4112, 4113, 4036 of 2024); Applications for Cancellation of Bail Nos. 125 and 127 of 2023, 49 and 127 of 2024; Criminal Applications Nos. 499, 2436, 2874, 3038, 4204 of 2023 (with 3982 of 2024) and 1188 of 2024; Criminal Writ Petitions No. 215 of 2019 and Nos. 276, 984, 1110, 1137, 1222, 1398, 1592, 1646, 1675 with 1676, 1724, 1730, 1881, 1892, 1897, 1898 of 2023; Criminal Revision Application No. 109 of 2024 with No. 65 of 2024 and Criminal Applications Nos. 2142 and 2143 of 2024 in Revn/65/2024. Interim relief/undertakings/statements, if any, continue till next hearing. No arguments advanced, no statute or precedent cited, no merits decided; useful only to track scheduling/status of these specific matters.