Allowed

Jyoti Nagar Co. Opo Housing Soc Ltd. and Ors. v. Vishwanath Devmane and Ors.

Bombay HC26 Sept 2024IA/12369/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Interim application for condonation of delay in filing an application to set aside a writ petition dismissal. The High Court allowed the application without notice to respondents since the original petition was dismissed pre-noticing. The petition was restored and the office objection period reset.

What did the court decide?

Application for condonation of delay allowed; petition restored; duty to remove office objection given.

Jyoti Nagar Co. Opo Housing Soc Ltd… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

2-IA-12369-2024.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

INTERIM APPLICATION NO.12369 OF 2024 IN WRIT PETITION (ST) NO.2620 OF 2022

¶4

Jyoti Nagar Co.Op. Hsg. So. Ltd. & Ors. …. Applicants

¶5

Digitally signed NILAM by NILAM SANTOSH SANTOSHKAMBLE KAMBLE Date: 2024.09.27 10:43:21 +0530

¶6

IN THE MATTER BETWEEN

¶7

Jyoti Nagar Co.Op. Hsg. So. Ltd. & Ors. …. Petitioners V/s.

¶8

Shri.Vishwanath Devmane & Ors. …. Respondents

¶9

Mr.Girish Pawar i/b Mr.Samir Sarambalkar, for the Applicants/Petitioners. Ms.S.S. Jadhav, AGP, for Respondent No.5-State.

¶10

CORAM : R.M. JOSHI, J.

¶11

DATE : 26^th SEPTEMBER 2024

¶12

P.C:-

¶13

. This Application is for condonation of delay of 8

¶14

months and 18 days in filing of the Application for setting aside

¶15

order dated 2^nd January 2024 dismissing Writ Petition Stamp No.2620 of 2022 for non-removal of office objection.

¶16

The learned counsel for the Applicant submits that,

¶17

N.S. Kamble page 1 of 3

¶18

2-IA-12369-2024.doc

¶19

the Respondents were not served with the notice in the original proceedings and such no notice is required to be served upon them in this Application. It is his contention that, considering the reasons mentioned in the Application the same deserves to be allowed.

¶20

Since, the Petition was dismissed at the stage of removal of objection and before issuance of notice to the Respondents, this Courts finds no impediment in entertaining the Application without issuing notice to the Respondent.

¶21

For the reasons mentioned in the Application, it can be said that, there was no deliberate and intentional act on the part of the Petitioner in not removing the office objection. The learned counsel for the Petitioner undertakes to remove office objection within three weeks from today.

¶22

In view of this, the Application deserves to be allowed and accordingly allowed in terms of prayer Clauses (a) and (b).

¶23

The Petition be restored to the stage of its dismissal.

¶24

The Petitioner to remove office objection within a

¶25

N.S. Kamble page 2 of 3

¶26

2-IA-12369-2024.doc

¶27

period of three weeks and failure thereto the Petition shall stands

¶28

dismissed without reference to the Court.

¶29

(R.M. JOSHI, J.)

¶30

N.S. Kamble page 3 of 3

Jyoti Nagar Co. Opo Housing Soc Ltd. and Ors. v. Vishwanath Devmane and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jyoti Nagar Co. Opo Housing Soc Ltd. and Ors. v. Vishwanath Devmane and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mahesh Keshtibhai Mehta vs the Bharatiya Friends Cooperative Hosuing Society Ltd.

Ramdhari D Mishra and Ors. vs Slum Rehabilitation Authority and Ors.

Avesh Abdul Kalam Shaikh vs State of Maharashtra

Kisor Ramdas Fatpure vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Yogesh Enterprises Thr Its Proprietor vs the State of Maharashtra Thr Its Principal Secretary and Ors.

Yogesh Enterprises Thr Its Proprietor vs the State of Maharashtra Thr Its Principal Secretary and Ors.