Allowed

Yogesh Enterprises Thr Its Proprietor v. the State of Maharashtra Thr Its Principal Secretary and Ors.

Bombay HC26 Sept 2024IA/13004/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Interim applications for restoration of five writ petitions filed by the applicant were considered. Finding no malafides attributable to the petitioner, the court allowed the applications and restored the petitions.

What did the court decide?

Writ petitions restored to file at stage of dismissal in terms of prayer clause (a).

What the court decided

Yogesh Enterprises Thr Its Proprietor vs the State… — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

28-IA-13005-24 IN WP-680-22 WITH CONT. MT..doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

INTERIM APPLICATION NO.13005 OF 2024 IN

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO.680 OF 2022

¶5

Yogesh Enterprises …. Applicant

¶6

Digitally signed NILAM by NILAM SANTOSH SANTOSHKAMBLE KAMBLE Date: 2024.09.27 10:43:26 +0530

¶7

V/s.

¶8

The State of Maharashtra & Ors. …. Respondents

¶9

WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.13000 OF 2024 IN WRIT PETITION NO.665 OF 2022

¶10

Yogesh Enterprises Thr. Its Proprietor …. Applicant V/s.

¶11

The State of Maharashtra, Thr. Its Principal …. Respondents Secretary & Ors.

¶12

WITH

¶13

INTERIM APPLICATION NO.13003 OF 2024 IN WRIT PETITION NO.676 OF 2022

¶14

Yogesh Enterprises Thr. Its Proprietor …. Applicant V/s.

¶15

The State of Maharashtra, Thr. Its Principal …. Respondents Secretary & Ors.

¶16

WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.13004 OF 2024 IN

¶17

WRIT PETITION NO.667 OF 2022

¶18

N.S. Kamble page 1 of 3

¶19

28-IA-13005-24 IN WP-680-22 WITH CONT. MT..doc

¶20

Yogesh Enterprises Thr. Its Proprietor …. Applicant V/s.

¶21

The State of Maharashtra, Thr. Its Principal …. Respondents Secretary & Ors.

¶22

WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.13002 OF 2024 IN WRIT PETITION NO.675 OF 2022

¶23

Yogesh Enterprises Thr. Its Proprietor …. Applicant V/s.

¶24

The State of Maharashtra, Thr. Its Principal …. Respondents Secretary & Ors.

¶25

Ms.Madhavi Ayyappan i/b Talekar & Associates, for the Applicant in all IA.

¶26

Ms.Tanu Bhatia, AGP, for Respondent Nos.1 to 3-State in all IA.

¶27

CORAM : R.M. JOSHI, J.

¶28

DATE : 26^th SEPTEMBER 2024

¶29

P.C:-

¶30

. These Applications are for restoration of above Writ

¶31

Petitions. The Applications are in time.

¶32

Considering the reasons mentioned in the

¶33

Application, no malafides can be attributed against the Petitioner.

¶34

Hence, all Applications stand allowed in terms of prayer Clause (a).

¶35

N.S. Kamble page 2 of 3

¶36

28-IA-13005-24 IN WP-680-22 WITH CONT. MT..doc

¶37

These Writ Petitions be restored to the file at the

¶38

stage of its dismissal.

¶39

(R.M. JOSHI, J.)

¶40

N.S. Kamble page 3 of 3

Yogesh Enterprises Thr Its Proprietor v. the State of Maharashtra Thr Its Principal Secretary and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Yogesh Enterprises Thr Its Proprietor v. the State of Maharashtra Thr Its Principal Secretary and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mahesh Keshtibhai Mehta vs the Bharatiya Friends Cooperative Hosuing Society Ltd.

Ramdhari D Mishra and Ors. vs Slum Rehabilitation Authority and Ors.

Avesh Abdul Kalam Shaikh vs State of Maharashtra

Kisor Ramdas Fatpure vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Jyoti Nagar Co. Opo Housing Soc Ltd. and Ors. vs Vishwanath Devmane and Ors.

Yogesh Enterprises Thr Its Proprietor vs the State of Maharashtra Thr Its Principal Secretary and Ors.