In a PIL concerning unspecified public projects, the court dismissed the petition for vagueness and disposed of the matter without engaging on substantive contentions.
Public Interest Litigation stands disposed of; no specific relief granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
77 pil46-23.docx
Digitally signed by TRUSHA TRUSHA TUSHAR TUSHAR MOHITE MOHITE Date: 2023.04.13 19:09:14 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.46 OF 2023
Yogesh Balasaheb Shitole and Anr. ….. Petitioners
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ….. Respondents
Mr. Shekhar Jagtap a/w Ms.Rhea Francis and Mr.Karan Rasane i/b Mr. Ranjeet Nimbalkar for the Petitioners
Mr.P.P.Kakade, G.P. a/w Mrs.R.A.Salunkhe, A.G.P. for the State
CORAM: S.V. GANGAPURWALA, ACJ & SANDEEP V. MARNE,J.
DATED : APRIL 12, 2023
P.C.
1 We have heard Mr.Jagtap the learned Counsel for the Petitioner and the learned G.P.
2 The prayers in the Petition do not lead us anywhere.
The prayers neither contain the details of the projects nor appear to be specific.
3 In light of that, the Public Interest Litigation stands disposed of.
1/2
Mohite
77 pil46-23.docx
(SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.) (ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE)
2/2
Mohite
Yogesh Balasaheb Shitole and Anr.
The State of Maharashtra and Ors.
S. V. Gangapurwala
Sandeep V. Marne
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
