High Court of Bombay disposed of a writ petition challenging a government resolution after a corrigendum rendered the challenge impermissible. Court granted representation time and dismissed the interim application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(64)-WP-1142-23.doc .
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.1142 OF 2023 WITH
Digitally signed by BALAJI BALAJIGOVINDRAO GOVINDRAOPANCHAL PANCHAL Date: 2023.04.15 10:33:19 +0530
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1851 OF 2023
Malayya S/o Siddhyya Mathpati & Ors.
..Petitioners/Applicants
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
..Respondents
Mr. Sanjay B. Bhosale, for the Petitioners/Applicants. Mr. M. M. Pabale, AGP for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2/State. Mr. Vishwanath patil, for the Respondent Nos.3 & 4/ZP Solapur.
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA, ACTING CJ &
SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
DATE : 11th APRIL, 2023
P.C.
BGP. 1 o f 2
(64)-WP-1142-23.doc .
consider the existing rules and the corrigendum issued and take decision upon the representations of the petitioners expeditiously and preferably within three months from the date of filing of the representations on their own merits and in accordance with law.
costs.
[SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.]
[ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE]
2 o f 2
BGP.
Malayya S/o Siddhyya Mathpati & Ors.
The State of Maharashtra
S. V. Gangapurwala
Sandeep V. Marne
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
