Petitioner withdrew a public interest litigation with liberty to file afresh if discrepancies are found in the list. The court disposed of the PIL granting the requested liberty.
Liberty to withdraw PIL with liberty to file afresh if discrepancies found in the list.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
3.39.23-wp.docx
BASAVRAJ GURAPPA PATIL
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 39 OF 2023
Digitally signed by BASAVRAJ GURAPPA PATIL Date: 2023.02.21 11:42:13 +0530
Sushant More
….. Petitioner
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
….. Respondent
Mr. Rakesh Bhatkar I/b. Mr. Mohan N. Devkule for the Petitioner Mr. P. P. Kakade, GP a/w. Mr. B. V. Samant, AGP for the State
CORAM: S.V.GANGAPURWALA, ACJ & SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
DATED : FEBRUARY 20, 2023
P.C.
(SANDEEP V. MARNE, J)
(ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE)
1/1
Basavraj
Sushant More
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
S.V. Gangapurwala
Sandeep V. Marne
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
