This order disposed off a bundle of connected writ petitions. Counsel submitted that the purpose for which the petitions were filed had been served. The High Court accepted this submission and disposed of the petitions and pending civil applications.
The writ petitions were disposed off. Pending civil applications were disposed off.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp9849.17
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
902 WRIT PETITION NO.9849 OF 2017 WITH PIL/67/2018 WITH WP/7088/2018 WITH CA/8383/2017 IN WP/12567/2016 WITH WP/9015/2018 WITH WP/12567/2016
PRANAV BHAUSAHEB BASPURE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioner in WP 9849 of 2017: Mr. Milind Patil. Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. P.S. Anerao and Mr. M.L. Paithane h/f Mr. M.A. Golegaonar in respective petitions. AGP for Respondents: Mr. P.S. Patil
Advocate for Respondent No.2 (WP No. 9849 of 2017, WP No. 9015 of 2018 and WP 12567/2018) and for R. No.3 in WP No. 7088 of 2018: Mr. M.D. Narwadkar
CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE AND SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, JJ. DATED : 15th FEBRUARY, 2023.
PER COURT :-
wp9849.17
-2-
(SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE , J.)
rlj/
Pranav Bhausheb Baspure
State of Maharashtra
Sanjay A. Deshmukh
Ravindra V. Ghuge
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
