Disposed

Smt. Sunita Narendra Sawant v. Honourable Registrar General High Court Mumbai and Anr.

Bombay HC17 Feb 2023WP/1811/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner, a retired employee, challenged the selective implementation of a Government Resolution on revised pay-scales, claiming denial of benefits compared to inservice colleagues. The court accepted the administration's assurance of pending processing and disposed of the petition without costs.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition disposed of with no costs awarded to any party.

Smt. Sunita Narendra Sawant Vs Honourable… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Bombay HC (2023)

¶1

8-WP-1811-2023

¶2

Pdp

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO. 1811 OF 2023

¶5

Smt. Sunita Narendra Sawant .. Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

Digitally signed byPRAVIN PRAVINDASHARATH DASHARATHPANDIT PANDIT Date: 2023.02.20 10:58:11 +0530

¶8

Honourable Registrar General, High Court, Mumbai & Anr. .. Respondents

¶9

Mr. Sanjay Kulkarni for petitioner. Ms. Rebecca Gonsalves for respondent no.1. Mrs. R. A. Salunkhe, AGP for respondent no.2.

¶10

CORAM: S. V. GANGAPURWALA, ACTING CJ. & SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.

¶11

DATE: FEBRUARY 17, 2023

¶12

P.C.:

¶13

1. We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶14

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has retired in November, 2019. The Government Resolution is issued on 19^th April, 2022 with regard to the revised pay-scales. The same is given effect from 1^st April, 2011. According to the learned counsel the retired employees are not given the benefits of the said Government Resolution, whereas inservice employees are given the benefits. The grant is also received.

¶15

3. Ms. Rebecca Gonsalves, learned counsel for respondent no.1 submits that as far as retired employees are concerned, the grant is not received. The exercise of pay fixation of the retired employees is undertaken. The grant is received in respect of inservice employees. Moreover, to them also the arrears have not been paid.

¶16

¶17

8-WP-1811-2023

¶18

4. The pay fixation of the retired employees naturally would take some time.

¶19

5. The statement is made that the process is undertaken and on receipt of the grant, the payment would be made.

¶20

6. In view of the above statement, writ petition stands disposed of. No costs.

¶21

(SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.) (ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE)

¶22

Smt. Sunita Narendra Sawant v. Honourable Registrar General High Court Mumbai and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Sunita Narendra Sawant v. Honourable Registrar General High Court Mumbai and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bhagawati Signature LLP Navi Mumbai and Anr. Vs the City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra Ltd. and Ors.

Mohd. Ejaj Chandsaheb Kanul Vs the State of Maha. Thr. Minority Development Dept. and Anr.

Jivan Jagannath Nande and Ors. Vs Thane Municipal Corporation Thr. Commissioner and Ors.

Shri Sachin Ashok Kamble Vs the Secretary Maharashtra Public Service Commission and Anr.

Brihanmumbai Municipal Cororation Municipal Head Office Vs Avinash Ganpat Jagtap

Shri. Vasant Sakharam Darade Vs the Union of India through the Secretary of Defence and Ors.