Disposed

Vinod H Kadam v. State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Bombay HC13 Jun 2022WP/6944/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of the writ petition by recording the petitioner's promise to file a regularization application online within four weeks. The order directs the corporation to decide the application expeditiously and grants no coercive action against the structure until the decision is communicated and two weeks have passed.

What did the court decide?

Direction to file regularization online within four weeks and stay coercive action until decision on application is communicated plus two weeks.

Vinod H Kadam Vs State of Maharashtra and Ors. — Property and Title | Bombay HC (2022)

SRS

505-WP-6944-2022.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO. 6944 OF 2022

¶6

Vinod H Kadam .. Petitioner

¶7

V/s

¶8

State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents

¶9

*******

¶10

Mr.Ajinkya M. Udane for Petitioner. Mr.Deepak R. More a/w Mr.Shivram A. Gawade for Respondents No.2 to 7.

¶11

¶12

CORAM: A. A. SAYED & ABHAY AHUJA, JJ.

¶13

DATE : 13^th JUNE 2022

¶14

P.C. :-

¶15

The subject matter of the Writ Petition is Shree Krushna Wadewale and Sweets, Survey No.34, Behind Sameer Lawns, Ravet, PCMC, Ward No.-19, Pune–Maharashtra – 412101.

¶16

It is the case of the Petitioner that though notices under MRTP or Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act have been issued to adjoining structures, no notice has been issued to the Petitioner. The apprehension of the Petitioner is that his

1/3

SRS

505-WP-6944-2022.doc

structure may be demolished. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner states that the Petitioner will be filing Regularisation Application within four weeks.

¶22

In respect of adjoining structures, where notices have been issued, we have passed orders allowing the Petitioners to file Regularisation Applications. In the facts and circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice, we dispose of the Petition by passing the following order:

¶23

ORDER

¶24

(i) We record the statement of the learned Counsel for the Petitioner that the Regularization Application shall be filed online by the Petitioner within four weeks from today;

¶25

(ii) If such Regularization Application is filed, the same shall be disposed of by the Respondent-Corporation expeditiously and the decision on the same shall be communicated to the Petitioner.

¶26

(iii) Until the Regularization Application is decided and for a period of two weeks from the date of communication of the decision to the Petitioner on the Regularization Application, no coercive steps shall be taken against the structure of the Petitioner.

2/3

SRS

505-WP-6944-2022.doc

The Petition is disposed of in the above terms.

¶32

(ABHAY AHUJA, J.) (A. A. SAYED, J.)

¶33

3/3

Vinod H Kadam v. State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vinod H Kadam v. State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Polyrub Extrusion Pvt. Ltd. Thr Chandrashekhar D Rane Vs Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation and Anr.

Kanhu Krishna Sandbhor Vs State of Maharashtra Thr Government Pleader and Ors.

Appa Kirshna Sandbhor Vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Murji Kanji Patel Vs Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and 2 Ors.

Shree Bajrang Sra Co-Op Hsg Society Ltd. and 2ORS Vs the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and 2 Ors.

Sandip Raju Naik Vs Murji Kanji Patel and 3 Ors.