The writ petition and interim application were allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of without any substantive discussion or legal principle laid down.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 2. WP 1243-22.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1243 OF 2022
Murji Kanji Patel … Petitioner Vs.
Mumbai Municipal Corporation of Gr. Mumbai & Ors. … Respondents
WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 849 OF 2022 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1243 OF 2022
Sandip Raju Naik … Applicant Vs. Murji Kanji Patel & Ors. … Respondents
Mr. Shrirang Katneshwarkar i/b Shubham Misar for Petitioner. Mr. A. A. Kumbhakoni, Advocate General with Mr. Abhay Patki, Addl GP for State of Maharashtra.
Mr. Anil Sakhare with Mr. Joel Carlos and Mrs. Madhuri More for MCGM.
Mr. Kirankumar J. Phakade, for Intervenor.
CORAM : A.A. SAYED & ABHAY AHUJA, JJ. DATE : 13TH JUNE 2022
P.C. :
the Petition. The Petition is allowed to be withdrawn and to stand disposed of.
(ABHAY AHUJA, J.) (A.A. SAYED, J.)
Digitally signed NIKITA by NIKITAYOGESH YOGESH GADGIL GADGIL Date:2022.06.14 15:18:10 +0530
1 of 1
Nikita Gadgil
Murji Kanji Patel
Mumbai Municipal Corporation of Gr. Mumbai
Sandip Raju Naik
Murji Kanji Patel
A.A. Sayed
Abhay Ahuja
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
