Disposed

Appa Kirshna Sandbhor v. State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Bombay HC10 Jun 2022WP/6824/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition regarding a restaurant structure facing potential demolition. Court directed the petitioner to file a regularisation application online within three weeks. Petitioner granted a moratorium on coercive steps pending disposal of the application and for two weeks thereafter.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to file regularisation application within three weeks. Coercive steps stayed until decision is communicated and for two weeks thereafter.

Appa Kirshna Sandbhor Vs State of Maharashtra and… — Municipal and Town Planning | Bombay HC (2022)

¶1

1/2

¶2

501-wp-6824-2021.doc

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶4

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO.6824 OF 2022

¶6

Appa Krishna Sandbhor ...Petitioner v/s. State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents

¶7

...Respondents

¶8

Mr.Ajinkya M.Udane for the Petitioner.

¶9

Mr.Deepak More a/w Mr.Shvram A.Gawade for the RespondentCorporation.

¶10

Mr.A.A.Alaspurkar, AGP for the State.

¶11

CORAM : A.A. SAYED &

¶12

ABHAY AHUJA, JJ.

¶13

DATED : 10 JUNE 2022

¶14

P.C.:

¶15

The subject matter of the Writ Petition is Sharvi Restaurant, Survey No.83/1/1, Mumbai-Pune Highway, Kiwle, Pune.

¶16

It is the case of the Petitioner that though notices under MRTP or Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act have been issued to adjoining structures, no notice has been issued to the Petitioner. The apprehension of the Petitioner is that his structure may be demolished. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner states that the Petitioner will be filing Regularisation Application within three weeks.

¶17

In respect of adjoining structures, where notices have been issued, we have passed orders allowing the Petitioners to file Regularisation Applications. In the facts and circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice, we dispose of the Petition by passing the following order:

1/2

Uday.P.Kambli

2/2

501-wp-6824-2021.doc

O R D E R

(i) We record the statement of the learned Counsel for the Petitioner that the Regularization Application shall be filed online by the Petitioner within three weeks from today;

¶24

(ii) If such Regularization Application is filed, the same shall be disposed of by the Respondent-Corporation expeditiously and the decision on the same shall be communicated to the Petitioner.

¶25

(iii) Until the Regularization Application is decided and for a period of two weeks from the date of communication of the decision to the Petitioner on the Regularization Application, no coercive steps shall be taken against the structure of the Petitioner.

¶26

The Petition is disposed of in the above terms.

(ABHAY AHUJA,J.)

(A.A.SAYED, J.)

2/2

Uday.P.Kambli

Appa Kirshna Sandbhor v. State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Appa Kirshna Sandbhor v. State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mr. Sameer Vijay Bhujbal Vs the Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation and Anr.

Shri. Sunil Mankar Vs Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation through Its Manager and Anr.

Arun Shripati Pawar Vs the State of Maharashtra Thr. Principal Secretary and Ors.

Polyrub Extrusion Pvt. Ltd. Thr Chandrashekhar D Rane Vs Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation and Anr.

Kanhu Krishna Sandbhor Vs State of Maharashtra Thr Government Pleader and Ors.

Murji Kanji Patel Vs Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and 2 Ors.