Disposed

Dhananjay Eknath Bhondve v. State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Bombay HC13 Jun 2022WP/6939/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This Single Judge Writ Petition concerns the petitioner's apprehension of demolition of his structure due to lack of prior notice for regularization. The Court directed the petitioner to file a regularization application within four weeks. Pending its disposal, no coercive action is to be taken against the structure.

What did the court decide?

Directed petitioner to file regularization application within four weeks; stay on coercive action after decision communication.

Dhananjay Eknath Bhondve Vs State of Maharashtra and… — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2022)

SRS

503-WP-6939-2022.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO. 6939 OF 2022

¶6

Dhananjay Eknath Bhondve .. Petitioner

¶7

V/s

¶8

State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents

¶9

*******

¶10

Mr.Ajinkya M. Udane for Petitioner. Mr.Deepak R. More a/w Mr.Shivram A. Gawade for Respondents No.2 to 7.

¶11

¶12

CORAM: A. A. SAYED & ABHAY AHUJA, JJ.

¶13

DATE : 13^th JUNE 2022

¶14

P.C. :-

¶15

Learned Counsel for the Petitioner states that the subject matter of the Writ Petition is now confined to Maharashtra Hotel and Snacks Centre, Survey No. 60/2/1, Mumbai – Bangalore Highway, Opp. Sentosa Resort, Ravet, Pune – 412101. (The property at Page No.19 i.e. Central Food Court, Next to MumbaiBengalore Highway, Ravet, Pune–412101 is already demolished.)

1/3

SRS

503-WP-6939-2022.doc

It is the case of the Petitioner that though notice under MRTP or Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act has been issued to adjoining structures, no notice has been issued to the Petitioner. The apprehension of the Petitioner is that his structure may be demolished. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner states that the Petitioner will be filing Regularisation Application within four weeks.

¶21

In respect of adjoining structures, where notices have been issued, we have passed orders allowing the Petitioners to file Regularisation Applications. In the facts and circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice, we dispose of the Petition by passing the following order:

¶22

ORDER

¶23

(i) We record the statement of the learned Counsel for the Petitioner that the Regularization Application shall be filed online by the Petitioner within four weeks from today;

¶24

(ii) If such Regularization Application is filed, the same shall be disposed of by the Respondent-Corporation expeditiously and the decision on the same shall be communicated to the Petitioner.

2/3

SRS

503-WP-6939-2022.doc

(iii) Until the Regularization Application is decided and for a period of two weeks from the date of communication of the decision to the Petitioner on the Regularization Application, no coercive steps shall be taken against the structure of the Petitioner.

¶30

The Petition is disposed of in the above terms.

¶31

(ABHAY AHUJA, J.)

¶32

(A. A. SAYED, J.)

¶33

3/3

Dhananjay Eknath Bhondve v. State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dhananjay Eknath Bhondve v. State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Polyrub Extrusion Pvt. Ltd. Thr Chandrashekhar D Rane Vs Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation and Anr.

Kanhu Krishna Sandbhor Vs State of Maharashtra Thr Government Pleader and Ors.

Appa Kirshna Sandbhor Vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Murji Kanji Patel Vs Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and 2 Ors.

Shree Bajrang Sra Co-Op Hsg Society Ltd. and 2ORS Vs the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and 2 Ors.

Sandip Raju Naik Vs Murji Kanji Patel and 3 Ors.