Dismissed

Shantaram Tulshiram Wagh v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Bombay HC4 Apr 2022WP/484/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Court could not hear the listed writ petitions due to paucity of time. All petitions to be listed for admission on 7th June, 2022. Ad-interim reliefs continue. Petitions not removing objections by 19th April, 2022, to be dismissed.

What did the court decide?

Matters listed for admission on 7th June 2022; objections to be removed by 19th April 2022 otherwise petitions to be dismissed.

Shantaram Tulshiram Wagh Vs the State of Maharashtra… — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2022)

¶1

¶2

39-WP-2511-17.odt

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶4

39 WRIT PETITION NO. 2511 OF 2017 WITH CA/14861/2018 IN WP/2511/2017

¶5

NAZIR KHAN NASIR KHAN AND OTHERS VERSUS

¶6

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

¶7

Advocate for Petitioners : Smt. A.N. Ansari

¶8

AGP for Respondent Nos. 1, 4 & 5 : Ms. R.P. Gaur Advocate for Respondent No. 2 & 3 : Mr. L.V. Sangeet

¶9

40 WRIT PETITION NO. 484 OF 2019

¶10

WITH WP/627/2019 WITH CA/4483/2020 IN WP/484/2019 WITH CA/4484/2020 IN WP/627/2019

¶11

SHANTARAM TULSHIRAM WAGH

¶12

VERSUS

¶13

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

¶14

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Madhur A. Golegaonkar and Mr. Golegaonkar Anil S.

¶15

AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 : Mr. S.G. Sangle Advocate for Respdt Nos 3 & 4 : Mr. Ashwini S. Hoge Patil

¶16

41 WRIT PETITION NO. 1184 OF 2019

¶17

THE GENERAL MAHAGAER TELECOM THROUGH SUB DIVISIONAL ENGINEER LEGAL AND OTHERS

¶18

VERSUS

¶19

RAMESH TUKARAM DIWATE AND OTHERS

¶20

Advocate for Petitioners : Mr Shyam C. Arora

¶21

AGP for Respondents: Mr. S.G. Sangle

¶22

Advocate for Respondent No. 1 : Mr. Pramod A. Pisal Advocate for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 : Mr. Bhushan B. Kulkarni

¶23

¶24

39-WP-2511-17.odt

¶25

43 WRIT PETITION NO. 4241 OF 2019

¶26

RAVI SHIVHSHANKAR MALODE VERSUS

¶27

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

¶28

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. U.R. Awate h/f Talekar And Associates AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 : Mr. S.G. Sangle Advocate for Respondent No. 3 : Mr. Ashok D. Raut

¶29

47 WRIT PETITION NO. 7074 OF 2019

¶30

RAJENDRA VIJAYKUMAR SUTAWANE VERSUS

¶31

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

¶32

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Ashok A. More AGP for Respondent Nos 1 to 3 : Mr. P.K. Lakhotiya Advocate for Respondent No. 4 : Mr. V.S. Bedre

¶33

48 WRIT PETITION NO. 7118 OF 2019

¶34

ANITA SUBHASH PARDESHI VERSUS

¶35

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

¶36

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Santosh S. Jadhavar Addl GP for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2: Mr. P.S. Patil Advocate for Respondent Nos. 3 & 4 : Mr. V.S. Bedre

¶37

50 WRIT PETITION NO. 7366 OF 2019

¶38

NAGNATH MALOJI SHINDE

¶39

VERSUS

¶40

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

¶41

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Irfan D. Maniyar AGP for Respondent No.1 & 2 : Mr. S.R. Yadav Advocate for Respondent Nos. 3 & 4 : Ms. Manjushri Shendage-Narwade

¶42

¶43

39-WP-2511-17.odt

¶44

56 WRIT PETITION NO. 8428 OF 2019

¶45

SANJAY KESHAVRAO NAYAK

¶46

VERSUS

¶47

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

¶48

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Vikram S. Kadam AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3: Mr. S.R. Yadav Advocate for Respondent Nos. 4 & 5 : Mr. Satyajit S. Bora

¶49

59 WRIT PETITION NO. 9553 OF 2019

¶50

RANI PUNDLIKRAO NITURE

¶51

VERSUS

¶52

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

¶53

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Manoj G. Biradar AGP for Respondent No. 1 : Mrs. M.A. Deshpande Advocate for Respondent No. 2 : Mr. Bhagwat A. Shinde Advocate for Respondent No. 3 : Mr. D.J. Chaudhary

¶54

62 WRIT PETITION NO. 10537 OF 2019

¶55

DEEPALI DIPALI GUNDU SURVASE VERSUS

¶56

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

¶57

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. B. L. Sagar Killarikar AGP for Respondent Nos 1 to 3 : Ms.R.P. Gaur Advocate for Respondent No. 5 & 6 : Mr. D. J. Chaudhary

¶58

67 WRIT PETITION NO. 11862 OF 2019

¶59

OM SAI PRATHISHTHAN THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT SHANKAR

¶60

KISANRAO KAWAR

¶61

VERSUS

¶62

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

¶63

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. S.R.Sapkal And Mr. R N Khedkar AGP for Respondent No. 1: Mr. P.K. Lakhotiya Advocate for Respondent No. 2 :Mr. S.V. Advant Advocate for Respondent No. 3 : Mr. Ajay G. Talhar

¶64

¶65

39-WP-2511-17.odt

¶66

68 WRIT PETITION NO. 11946 OF 2019 WITH WP/11911/2019

¶67

TARABAI CHANGDEO GUNJAL AND OTHERS VERSUS

¶68

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

¶69

Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Vinod Y. Bhide AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 to 5 : Mr. S.G. Sangle Advocate for Respondent No. 6 : Mr. V.S. Bedre

¶70

71 WRIT PETITION NO. 13214 OF 2019

¶71

SHAIKH RIJWANA BEGUM MOHAMMAD SHAFIYODDIN VERSUS

¶72

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

¶73

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Vijay B. Patil AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 : Ms. R.P. Gaur Advocate for Respondent No. 3 : Mr. D.S. Mali Advocate for Respondent Nos. 4 & 5 : Mr. Suhash P. Urgunde

¶74

75 WRIT PETITION NO. 14319 OF 2019 WITH WP/14339/2019

¶75

DEVIDAS SURYABHAN GUJJAR AND ANOTHER VERSUS

¶76

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

¶77

Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Sushant B. Choudhari AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 : Mr. S.G. Sangle

¶78

80 WRIT PETITION NO. 15389 OF 2019 WITH CA/5103/2022 IN WP/15389/2019

¶79

NARENDRA GANGARAMPANT SATWASE VERSUS

¶80

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

¶81

Advocate for Petitioner : Ms. A.N. Ansari

¶82

AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4: Mr. P. K. Lakhotiya Advocate for Respondent Nos. 4 & 5 : Mr. Satnosh R. Yadav

¶83

¶84

39-WP-2511-17.odt

¶85

CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE AND S. G. DIGE, JJ.

¶86

DATE : 4^th APRIL, 2022

¶87

PER COURT :-

¶88

All these matters were called out at 6.20 P. M.

¶89

Due to paucity of time these matters cannot be heard today.

¶90

All office objections shall be removed on or before 19^th April, 2022, failing which, the petition in which objections are not removed, shall stand dismissed without reference to the Court on 20^th April, 2022.

¶91

Subject to the above, all these matters shall be listed in the due admission category on 7^th June, 2022.

¶92

The ad-interim relief, if any, granted earlier would continue.

¶93

( S.G. DIGE ) ( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE ) JUDGE JUDGE

¶94

mtk

Shantaram Tulshiram Wagh v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shantaram Tulshiram Wagh v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohsinkhan Taimurkhan Pathan Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Pradeep Damodhar Limbkar and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Kamini Ashok Patil Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Manasi Vikram Bhagwat and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Rameshwar Tukaram Sonawane Vs the Secretary Social Justice and Empowerment Dept and Others

Sanjay Prabhakar Thakur Vs the State of Mahrashtra and Others