Partly allowed

Sanjay Prabhakar Thakur v. the State of Mahrashtra and Others

Bombay HC4 Apr 2022CA/10046/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad corrected factual inaccuracies regarding petitioners' salary claims, clarifying that all salary up to November 2021 was received. The court disposed of ancillary civil applications and directed that the principal writ petitions be listed for final hearing, referencing a Supreme Court judgment.

What did the court decide?

Civil applications disposed of with direction to list writ petitions for final hearing on 9th June 2022.

Sanjay Prabhakar Thakur Vs the State of Mahrashtra and… — Service and Employment | Bombay HC (2022)

¶1

¶2

13-CA-6245-21.odt

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶4

13 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6245 OF 2021 IN WP/1084/2011 WITH WP/1084/2011 WITH CA/6943/2016 IN WP/1084/2011

¶5

RAMAKANT SUDHAKAR THAKUR

¶6

VERSUS

¶7

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

¶8

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Anil S. Golegaonkar AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 to 5 : Mr. S.R. Yadav Advocate for Respondents No. 6: Mr. V.B. Jadhav h/f

¶9

Mr. V. D. Hon, Senior Advocate

¶10

WITH

¶11

13 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6246 OF 2021 IN WP/1085/2011 WITH WP/1085/2011 WITH CA/10046/2016 IN WP/1085/2011

¶12

SANJAY PRABHAKAR THAKUR VERSUS

¶13

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

¶14

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Anil S. Golegaonkar AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 to 5 : Mr. S.R. Yadav Advocate for Respondents No. 6: Mr. V.B. Jadhav h/f

¶15

Mr. V. D. Hon, Senior Advocate

¶16

CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE AND S. G. DIGE, JJ.

¶17

DATE : 4^th APRIL, 2022

¶18

PER COURT :-

¶19

We have perused the order passed by this Court on 14-01-2022.

¶20

The learned AGP points out a communication received by respondent No. 5 from respondent No. 6, which indicates that, on 14-01-2022 when this Court passed an order, the petitioners had

¶21

¶22

13-CA-6245-21.odt

¶23

received their entire salary till November, 2021 and it was only the salary for the month of December, 2021, payable in January, 2022 that was pending.

¶24

We make it clear that the observations made by this Court in paragraph No. 2 of the order dated 14-01-2022 was in the light of the statement made by the petitioners that the order dated 13-08-2021 passed by this Court is not complied with by the respondents. Factually, it was complied with, except the December’s Salary payable in January, 2022. The petitioners apparently have made incorrect statement before us that their salary is withheld.

¶25

Considering the request made by the applicants in the civil applications, the same are disposed off with the direction that writ petition Nos. 1084 of 2011 and 1085 of 2011 shall be listed for final hearing on 9^th June, 2022.

¶26

The petitioners shall not seek an adjournment.

¶27

Needless to state, this Court would also consider the submissions of the petitioners in the light of the judgment delivered by the Apex Court in the matter of Chairman and Managing Director, Food Corporation of India and others Versus Jagdish Balaram Bahira and others (2017) 8 SCC 670 .

¶28

Consequently, Civil Application Nos. 6943 of 2016 and 10046 of 2016, do not survive and stand disposed off.

¶29

( S.G. DIGE ) ( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE ) JUDGE JUDGE

¶30

mtk

Sanjay Prabhakar Thakur v. the State of Mahrashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanjay Prabhakar Thakur v. the State of Mahrashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohsinkhan Taimurkhan Pathan Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Pradeep Damodhar Limbkar and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Kamini Ashok Patil Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Shantaram Tulshiram Wagh Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Manasi Vikram Bhagwat and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Rameshwar Tukaram Sonawane Vs the Secretary Social Justice and Empowerment Dept and Others