Allowed

Pradeep Damodhar Limbkar and Others v. the State of Maharashtra and Another

Bombay HC1 Apr 2022CA/4970/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court allowed two civil applications seeking to add applicants as petitioners in an underlying writ petition and to amend the petition memo. The court ordered specific amendments and set deadlines for filing reply affidavits and listing.

What did the court decide?

Applications allowed; addition of petitioners to be carried out forthwith; memo of petition amended by 13.04.2022; respondents entitled to file reply affidavits by 22.04.2022; matter listed for 29.04.

Pradeep Damodhar Limbkar and Others Vs the… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Bombay HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶2

CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4969 OF 2022

¶3

IN WP/12353/2019 WITH WP/12353/2019 WITH CA/4970/2022 IN

¶4

WP/12353/2019

¶5

MOHSINKHAN TAIMURKHAN PATHAN

¶6

VERSUS

¶7

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

¶8

Mr.S.V.Natu, Advocate for the applicant.
Mrs.M.A.Deshpande, AGP for State.
Mr.R.K.Ingole, Advocate for respondent No.2.

¶9

( CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE AND S.G. DIGE, JJ.)

¶10

 DATE : APRIL 1, 2022

¶11

PER COURT:

¶12

1.By these two applications, the applicants desire that they be
added as petitioners in the writ petition. Rest of the petitioners have
no objection. The learned Advocates for the respondents submit that an
appropriate order may be passed.

¶13

2. Considering the reasons set out in the application, CA

¶14

No.4969/2022 is allowed. Mr.Natu himself appears for the applicants.

¶15

Addition be carried out forthwith.

¶16

khs/April 2022/4969

¶17

- 2 -

¶18

3.In CA No.4970/2022, the applicants pray for adding paragraph
Nos. 13(a) to 13(c) and add two ground Nos. 9 and 10 and also add a
prayer clause (B-1).

¶19

4. The learned Advocates for the respondents oppose. In the alternative they submit that if this Court entertains this application, they may be permitted to file an additional affidavit in reply.

¶20

5.The petition is at pre-admission stage. Affidavit in reply are yet
to be filed.

¶21

6.In view of the above, this civil application is allowed. The
applicants shall amend the memo of the petition on or before
13.04.2022 and tender a freshly amended copy of the writ petition
memo on or before the same date and supply the copies to the other
side.

¶22

7. The respondents are at liberty to enter their affidavits in reply with proper pagination, on or before 22.04.2022.

¶23

8. List this petition on 29.04.2022.

¶24

 ( S.G. DIGE, J. ) ( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.)

¶25

khs/April 2022/4969

Pradeep Damodhar Limbkar and Others v. the State of Maharashtra and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pradeep Damodhar Limbkar and Others v. the State of Maharashtra and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shivaji Bapurao Jadhav (Died) Thr Lrs Sojarbai and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra Thr the Collector, Latur and Ors.

Jagdish Radhakisan Jakhete and Another Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Keshavrao Laxman Dangde Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Mohsinkhan Taimurkhan Pathan Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Kamini Ashok Patil Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Sanjay Dagadu Yevale and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary and Others