Court allowed applications to add applicants to an existing writ petition and amendments to the petition memo, noting the matter was at the pre-admission stage.
Causes entitled applicants added as petitioners and petition memo amended.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4969 OF 2022
IN WP/12353/2019 WITH WP/12353/2019 WITH CA/4970/2022 IN
WP/12353/2019
MOHSINKHAN TAIMURKHAN PATHAN
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Mr.S.V.Natu, Advocate for the applicant.
Mrs.M.A.Deshpande, AGP for State.
Mr.R.K.Ingole, Advocate for respondent No.2.
( CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE AND S.G. DIGE, JJ.)
DATE : APRIL 1, 2022
PER COURT:
1.By these two applications, the applicants desire that they be
added as petitioners in the writ petition. Rest of the petitioners have
no objection. The learned Advocates for the respondents submit that an
appropriate order may be passed.
2. Considering the reasons set out in the application, CA
No.4969/2022 is allowed. Mr.Natu himself appears for the applicants.
Addition be carried out forthwith.
khs/April 2022/4969
- 2 -
3.In CA No.4970/2022, the applicants pray for adding paragraph
Nos. 13(a) to 13(c) and add two ground Nos. 9 and 10 and also add a
prayer clause (B-1).
4. The learned Advocates for the respondents oppose. In the alternative they submit that if this Court entertains this application, they may be permitted to file an additional affidavit in reply.
5.The petition is at pre-admission stage. Affidavit in reply are yet
to be filed.
6.In view of the above, this civil application is allowed. The
applicants shall amend the memo of the petition on or before
13.04.2022 and tender a freshly amended copy of the writ petition
memo on or before the same date and supply the copies to the other
side.
7. The respondents are at liberty to enter their affidavits in reply with proper pagination, on or before 22.04.2022.
8. List this petition on 29.04.2022.
( S.G. DIGE, J. ) ( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.)
khs/April 2022/4969
MOHSINKHAN TAIMURKHAN PATHAN
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE
S.G. DIGE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court