Disposed

M/S. Rahul Agencies Thr. Authorised Narayan Panndurang Lokhande v. the State of Maha. Thr. Home Dept. (Transport) and Ors.

Bombay HC28 Nov 2022WP/14560/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner seeking release of vehicle banned from Mumbai municipal limits. Court allowed release condicionally on filing an undertaking and depositing a security sum.

What did the court decide?

Release of vehicle subject to filing of undertaking and deposit of Rs.10,000/- with the Regional Transport Office.

What the court decided

M/S. Rahul Agencies Thr. Authorised Narayan… — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2022)

¶1

Digitally signed by LAXMIKANT LAXMIKANT GOPAL GOPAL CHANDAN CHANDAN Date: 2022.11.29 12:00:01 +0530

¶2

(17) wp-14560.22.doc

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO.14560 OF 2022

¶5

M/s. Rahul Agencies : Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra and ors. : Respondents.

¶6

Ms. A P Madhuri for the Petitioner. Mrs. N M Mehra AGP for the Respondent/State.

¶7

CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA & ARIF S. DOCTOR, JJ. DATED : 28^th NOVEMBER 2022

¶8

P.C.

¶9

1 The Petitioner claims to be owner of the vehicle. The vehicle was plied in the City of Mumbai in breach of the directions issued in order dated 03.03.2004. Petitioner is ready to submit an undertaking that Petitioner would not ply the said vehicle within the limits of City of Mumbai. In light of that, we pass the following order :-

¶10

(a) The vehicle, subject matter of this petition shall be released to the Petitioner subject to the condition of (I) the Petitioner filing an undertaking before this Court to the effect that the vehicle shall not be plied in the city of Mumbai and shall be taken out of the limit of the City of Mumbai; and (ii) the Petitioner depositing a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with the concerned

¶11

1 of 2

¶12

lgc

¶13

(17) wp-14560.22.doc

¶14

Regional Transport Office.

¶15

(b) Only upon the deposit of sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) by the Petitioner with the concerned Regional Transport Office, and on the Petitioner producing true copy of the undertaking filed in this Court, the vehicle shall be released to the Petitioner on production of an authenticated copy of this order.

¶16

¶17

[ARIF S. DOCTOR, J]

¶18

[S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J]

¶19

2 of 2

¶20

lgc

M/S. Rahul Agencies Thr. Authorised Narayan Panndurang Lokhande v. the State of Maha. Thr. Home Dept. (Transport) and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

M/S. Rahul Agencies Thr. Authorised Narayan Panndurang Lokhande v. the State of Maha. Thr. Home Dept. (Transport) and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rizwan Irfan Shaikh Vs the Executive Engineer Bandra Division and 2 Ors.

Samaj Kalyan Co-Operative Housing Society Limited Vs the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and 3 Ors.

Riyaj Ibrahim Hundekari Vs Azhar Imam M. Ibrahim Pathan and Ors.

Hasan Khan Sardar Khan Thr Its Poa and Anr. Vs State of Maharashtra Thr Public Prosecutor and Ors.

M/S. Devi Construction Co. Vs Pune Municipal Corporation Adn Anr.

Savita Homemakers LLP and Anr. Vs Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation and Anr.