Disposed

Savita Homemakers LLP and Anr. v. Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation and Anr.

Bombay HC28 Nov 2022WP/6730/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court withdrew a writ petition filed by Savita Homemakers LLP against Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation with liberty to file a fresh petition if representations regarding CIDCO and Government are decided adversely.

What did the court decide?

Writ Petition disposed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh writ petition on fresh cause of action.

Savita Homemakers LLP and Anr. Vs Navi Mumbai… — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2022)

¶1

Digitally signed by LAXMIKANT LAXMIKANT GOPAL GOPAL CHANDAN CHANDAN Date: 2022.11.29 10:59:07 +0530

¶2

(1) wp-6730.22&IAs.doc

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO.6730 OF 2022

¶5

The Savita Homemakers LLP : Petitioner. Versus Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation & ors. : Respondents.

¶6

WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.10090 OF 2022 IN WRIT PETITION NO.6730 OF 2022 Hitesh Muljibhai Shah & ors. : Applicants. In the matter between The Savita Homemakers LLP : Petitioner. Versus Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation & ors. : Respondents.

¶7

WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.10089 OF 2022 IN WRIT PETITION NO.6730 OF 2022 Pravin Uka Mera : Applicant. In the matter between The Savita Homemakers LLP : Petitioner. Versus Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation & ors. : Respondents.

¶8

Mr. Amit Mehta a/w Mr. Hitesh Mishra and Mr. V Shukla for the Petitioners. Mr. R P Kadam, AGP for the Respondent/State. Mr. Tejas Dande for Respondent No.1. Mr. Nitin V Gangal a/w Mr. Ahsok D Kadam for Respondent No.2- CIDCO

¶9

1 of 2

¶10

lgc

¶11

(1) wp-6730.22&IAs.doc

¶12

CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA & ARIF S. DOCTOR, JJ. DATED : 28^th NOVEMBER 2022

¶13

P.C.

¶14

1 The learned counsel for the Petitioners, on instructions, seek leave to withdraw the Writ Petition with liberty to file a fresh Writ Petition if the representations of the Petitioners with CIDCO and Government are decided against the Petitioners.

¶15

2 Learned AGP for the Respondents-State and learned counsel for the Respondent-CIDCO are present.

¶16

3 In the light of prayer made, the Writ Petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh Writ Petition on fresh cause of action.

¶17

4 In view of disposal of Writ Petition, Interim Application Nos.10090

¶18

of 2022 and 10089 of 2022 do not survive and the same are disposed of accordingly.

¶19

[ARIF S. DOCTOR, J]

¶20

[S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J]

¶21

2 of 2

¶22

lgc

Savita Homemakers LLP and Anr. v. Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Savita Homemakers LLP and Anr. v. Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rizwan Irfan Shaikh Vs the Executive Engineer Bandra Division and 2 Ors.

Samaj Kalyan Co-Operative Housing Society Limited Vs the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and 3 Ors.

Riyaj Ibrahim Hundekari Vs Azhar Imam M. Ibrahim Pathan and Ors.

Hasan Khan Sardar Khan Thr Its Poa and Anr. Vs State of Maharashtra Thr Public Prosecutor and Ors.

M/S. Devi Construction Co. Vs Pune Municipal Corporation Adn Anr.

Mr. Kamlakar Kashinath Taware and Anr. Vs Bhiwandi Nizampur City Municipal Corporation and Ors.