Disposed

Sunil Govind Jadhav v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Bombay HC21 Jul 2022WP/1376/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In two criminal writ petitions, the High Court of Bombay at Bombay disposed of the appeals following a 'C' Summary granted by the Special Court, directing the sessions court not to proceed as the complaint was treated as civil in nature.

What did the court decide?

Both Criminal Writ Petitions No. 1376 of 2015 and No. 995 of 2016 were disposed of as the accused and complainant had no further case to pursue.

Sunil Govind Jadhav Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr. — Corruption | Bombay HC (2022)

¶1

Osk

¶2

 8-Wp-1376-2015.odt

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶4

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶5

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1376 OF 2015

¶6

Sunil Govind Jadhav… Petitioner
V/s.

¶7

The State of Maharashtra & Anr.… Respondents

¶8

WITH

¶9

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 995 OF 2016

¶10

Devendra S. Doctor… Petitioner
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra & Anr.… Respondents

¶11

None for Petitioner in both Petitions.
Mr.Ajay Patil, A.P.P. for Respondent-State.

¶12

CORAM : A.S. GADKARI AND

¶13

RAJESH S. PATIL, JJ.

¶14

DATE : 21st July 2022.

¶15

P.C. :

¶16

1. None for Petitioner in both Petitions.

¶17

2. Petitioner - Sunil G. Jadhav (Original Accused) in Writ Petition

¶18

No.1376 of 2015 has impugned Order dated 20th January 2015 passed by the

¶19

Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Mumbai, in Misc. Application No. 10 of

¶20

2015, thereby directing investigation under Section 156(3) of The Criminal

¶21

Procedure Code, on a complaint filed by Respondent No.2. Whereas Petitioner

¶22

1/2

¶23

Osk 8-Wp-1376-2015.odt

¶24

- Devendra S. Doctor in Writ Petition No. 995 of 2016 is Original Complainant

¶25

in Misc. Application No. 10 of 2015.

¶26

3.Learned A.P.P. submitted that, in furtherance of directions issued
by the Sessions Court dated 20th January 2015, M.E.C.R. No. 56 of 2016 was
registered by Anti Corruption Bureau, Mumbai. That, after completion of
investigation, the Investigating Agency reached to the conclusion that the
complaint filed by Respondent No.2-Devendra S. Doctor in Writ Petition No.
1376 of 2015 has no substance in it and infact was of civil nature.

¶27

In view thereof, Respondent No.1 filed “C” Summary Report
before the learned Special Judge, under P.C. Act, Greater Mumbai, bearing
A.C.B. Miscellaneous Application No. 807 of 2020. The Trial Court by its
Order dated 21st June 2022 was pleased to accept the said report and granted
“C” Summary to the said crime.

¶28

4.In view thereof, both the Petitions filed by Original Accused so
also Original Complainant do not survive and are accordingly disposed off.

¶29

[RAJESH S. PATIL, J.][A.S. GADKARI, J.]

¶30

Digitally signed by OMKAR OMKAR SHIVAHAR SHIVAHAR KUMBHAKARN KUMBHAKARN Date: 2022.07.22 10:30:53 +0530

¶31

2/2

Sunil Govind Jadhav v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sunil Govind Jadhav v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shankar @ Bhagirath Bachaku Zha Vs the State of Maharashtra

Shankar @ Bhagirath Bachaku Zha Vs the State of Maharashtra

Devendra S. Doctor Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Sunil Sankharlalji Ostwal Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Tanaji Ramrao Yadav Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.