Interim application seeking expeditious hearing of Criminal Appeal No. 35 of 2017 is disposed of since the principal appeal survives the pendency of earlier proceedings, unlike prior orders suggested.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ssk
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2138 OF 2022
IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 35 OF 2017
Shankar @ Bhagirath Bachaku Zha..Applicant
Versus
State of Maharashtra..Respondent
Ms. Ameeta Kuttikrishnan for Applicant.
Mr. S. S. Hulke, APPP for Respondent
CORAM :A. S. GADKARI &
MILIND N. JADHAV, JJ.
DATE:23rd September, 2022.
P.C.:
.In view of the Judgment and Order dated 19.07.2022, present
Application for expeditious hearing of the Appeal does not survive and
is accordingly disposed off.
[ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]
[A. S. GADKARI, J.]
SONALI Digitally signedby SONALI SATISH SATISH KILAJEDate: 2022.09.26 KILAJE 11:03:51 +0530
1/1
Shankar @ Bhagirath Bachaku Zha
State of Maharashtra
A. S. Gadkari
M. N. Jadhav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court