The criminal appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution as the appellant did not appear despite two calls, and the record indicated a lack of interest in pursuing the appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
21-Apeal-1014-2019.odt
Osk
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1014 OF 2019
Tanaji Ramrao Yadav… Appellant
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.… Respondents
None for Appellant.
Mr.S.S. Hulke, A.P.P. for Respondent No.1-State.
CORAM : A.S. GADKARI AND
RAJESH S. PATIL, JJ.
DATE : 21st July 2022.
P.C. :
1. None for Appellant.
2.In the morning session also, none appeared for Appellant when
the present Petition was call out. Therefore it was kept back and called out in
the second session for hearing. In the second session also none appeared for
Appellant.
3.Record indicates that, since the day of filing of present Appeal,
i.e. 18th July 2019, neither the Appellant nor his Advocate on record have
taken any pains to circulate the present Appeal. It appears that, Appellant is
not interested in pursuing present Appeal.
4. Appeal is accordingly dismissed for non prosecution.
[RAJESH S. PATIL, J.][A.S. GADKARI, J.]
Digitally signed OMKAR by OMKARSHIVAHAR SHIVAHAR KUMBHAKARN KUMBHAKARN Date: 2022.07.22 10:28:50 +0530
1/1
Tanaji Ramrao Yadav
The State of Maharashtra
A.S. Gadkari
Rajesh S. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court