Writ petition withdrawn by petitioner after seeking liberty to file a fresh petition due to subsequent developments. Petition disposed of as withdrawn; notice to Respondent No.2 not issued.
Writ petition disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
SMITAJOHNSON Digitally signed by SMITAJOHNSON GONSALVESDate: 2022.07.12 GONSALVES 11:01:28 +0530
1.wp1001-19.doc
1/2
sg
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.1001 OF 2019
Rajesh Kumar Ratilal Vanigota .. Petitioner v/s.
The State of Maharashtra & Anr. .. Respondents
Mr. Rajesh B. Jain, a/w. Mr. Rohit Jain, i/b. Legal Juris, for the Petitioner.
Mr. J.P. Yagnik, APP, for State.
CORAM: NITIN JAMDAR & N.R. BORKAR, JJ.
DATE : 11 JULY 2022.
P.C:-
The petition is listed under the caption “For Withdrawal”. The notice was not issued to Respondent No.2, as spare copy has not been supplied.
1 of 2
1.wp1001-19.doc
2/2
sg
(N.R. BORKAR, J.)
(NITIN JAMDAR, J.)
2 of 2
Rajesh Kumar Ratilal Vanigota
The State of Maharashtra
Nitin Jamdar
N.R. Borkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
