This is a short order where the applicant stated an intention to seek discharge via a separate remedy and withdrew press for this application. The court disposed of the matter accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
SMITA Digitally signed by SMITA JOHNSON JOHNSON GONSALVESDate: 2022.07.13 GONSALVES 10:27:20 +0530
11.apl320-22.doc
1/1
sg
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.320 OF 2022
.. Javed Umar Shaikh Applicant v/s.
The State of Maharashtra & Anr. .. Respondents
Mr. Bharat K. Manghani, for the Applicant.
Mrs. A.S. Pai, PP, for State.
CORAM: NITIN JAMDAR & N.R. BORKAR, JJ.
DATE : 11 JULY 2022.
P.C:-
The learned Counsel for the Applicant, after arguing for some time, states that the Applicant intends to avail the remedy of seeking discharge and does not press this application.
(N.R. BORKAR, J.) (NITIN JAMDAR, J.)
1 of 1
Javed Umar Shaikh
The State of Maharashtra
Nitin Jamdar
N.R. Borkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
