In this writ petition, the petitioner stated he would seek discharge in the underlying proceeding and did not press for any relief. The court disposed of the petition without further order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
35-cr-wp-1704-22.doc
Digitally signed by DINESH DINESH SADANAND SADANAND SHERLA SHERLA Date: 2022.07.12 10:44:10 +0500
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1704 OF 2022
Prakash M. Mishra … Petitioner V/s.
The State of Maharashtra and anr. … Respondents
Mr.. Pradeep Melkunde a/w. Ms Anjali Chitta and Mr. Amit Singh for the Petitioner.
Mrs. S.D. Shinde, APP for the Respondent/ State.
CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR & N.R. BORKAR, JJ. DATE : 8 JULY 2022.
P.C.
. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner after arguing for some time states that the Petitioner will avail remedy of seeking discharge and does not press the petition.
2. The Writ Petition is disposed of as above.
(N.R. BORKAR, J.) (NITIN JAMDAR, J.)
1 / 1
Dinesh Sherla
Prakash M. Mishra
The State of Maharashtra
Nitin Jamdar
N.R. Borkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court