The applicant, appearing through counsel, stated an intention to seek remedy of discharge from the proceedings and did not press the present criminal application. The High Court disposed of the matter accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
SMITA Digitally signed by SMITA JOHNSON JOHNSON GONSALVESDate: 2022.07.13 GONSALVES 10:27:19 +0530
22.apl155-21.doc
1/1
sg
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.155 OF 2021
.. Roshan Digambar Waghmare Applicant v/s.
The State of Maharashtra & Anr. .. Respondents
Mr. Viral Rathod, a/w. Mr. Sudip Mallick, for the Applicant.
Mrs. S.D. Shinde, APP, for State.
CORAM: NITIN JAMDAR & N.R. BORKAR, JJ.
DATE : 11 JULY 2022.
P.C:-
The learned Counsel for the Applicant states that the Applicant intends to avail the remedy of seeking discharge and does not press this application.
(N.R. BORKAR, J.) (NITIN JAMDAR, J.)
1 of 1
Roshan Digambar Waghmare
The State of Maharashtra & Anr.
Nitin Jandhar.
N.R. Borkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
