Public Interest Litigation where Petitioner, party in person, submitted that the Government withdrew its impugned directions, rendering the purpose of the petition served and resulting in its disposal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
1007-PIL-92-21.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
1007 PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 92 OF 2021
CHAITANYA AJAY TALHAR
VERSUS
TH STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
Advocate for Petitioner : Party In Person AGP for Respondents: Mr. D.R. Kale
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND S. G. DIGE, JJ.
DATE : 23rd FEBRUARY, 2022
PER COURT :-
( S.G. DIGE ) ( S.V. GANGAPURWALA ) JUDGE JUDGE
mtk
CHAITANYA AJAY TALHAR
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
S. V. GANGAPURWALA
S. G. DIGE
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
