This court disposed of a writ petition where the petitioner sought appointment on compassionate ground, noting the proposal had been pending since 2018 with the Education Officer.
Respondent No.2 to decide the pending compassionate ground appointment on merits within four months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 wp 2546.2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
968 WRIT PETITION NO.2546 OF 2022
BALAJI MURLIDHAR GAIKWAD
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
...
Advocate for Petitioner: Jadhavar Aashish T
AGP for Respondents No.1&2: Mr. P. S. Patil
...
CORAM:S. V. GANGAPURWALA &
S. G. DIGE, JJ.
DATE:22nd FEBRUARY, 2022
PER COURT:
1.The learned Counsel for the Petitioner
submits that the proposal seeking approval to the
appointment of the Petitioner on compassionate
ground is pending with the Education Officer since
the year-2018.
2.The learned A.G.P. appears for Respondent
Nos. 1 and 2.
3.In case the proposal seeking approval to the
appointment of the Petitioner on compassionate
ground (Page No.31) is pending with Respondent
No.2, then Respondent No.2 shall decide the same
2 wp 2546.2022
on it’s own merits, in accordance with law,
expeditiously and preferably within a period of
four (04) months.
4. The Writ Petition accordingly stands disposed of. No costs.
[S. G. DIGE, J.] [S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.]
marathe
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant relief for appointment on compassionate ground pending with Respondent No.2.
BALAJI MURLIDHAR GAIKWAD
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
S. V. GANGAPURWALA
S. G. DIGE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court