The High Court found the petitioner not connected to the subject matter and directed them to prosecute with the Bar Council. The writ petition was disposed of with no costs.
Writ petition disposed of; no costs awarded to either party.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
2666.22WP
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
947 WRIT PETITION NO.2666 OF 2022
BALAJI BALIRAM BANDE
VERSUS
THE BAR COUNCIL OF MAHARASHTRA AND GOA &
OTHERS
Advocate for the petitioner : Mr.R.D.Biradar
I/c.GP for Respondent-State : Mr.D.R.Kale
…
CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA &
S.G.DIGE, JJ.
DATE : 23.02.2022
P.C. :
1]The petitioner does not seem to be remotely
connected with the subject matter at issue.
2]It is for the petitioner to prosecute with the Bar
Council concerned.
3]Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.
[S.G.DIGE, J.]
[S.V.GANGAPURWALA, J.]
DDC
BALAJI BALIRAM BANDE
THE BAR COUNCIL OF MAHARASHTRA AND GOA
S.V.GANGAPURWALA
S.G.DIGE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court