Writ petition filed challenging lack of cognizance regarding unauthorized bill sanctions. Court directed petitioner to prosecute representation. Writ petition disposed of without costs.
Petitioner directed to prosecute representation; writ petition disposed of with no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
2670.22WP
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
951 WRIT PETITION NO. 2670 OF 2022
JITENDRA HARISHCANDRA THAKUR
VERSUS
DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER & OTHERS
Advocate for the petitioners : Mr.Y.M.Patil
AGP for Respondent-State : Mr.A.S.Shinde
CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA &
S.G.DIGE, JJ.
DATE : 23.02.2022
P.C. :
1]We have heard learned counsel for the
petitioner.
2]The contention of the petitioner is that one
Mr.Sanjay Patil and two colleagues have unauthorizedly
sanctioned the bills. Three Member Committee was
constituted to enquire into the said aspect. The petitioner
has filed representation with the Collector but no
cognizance is taken.
3]At this stage, we are not inclined to pass any
orders. It is for the petitioner to prosecute his
representation as permissible under law.
2
2670.22WP
4]Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.
[S.G.DIGE, J.]
[S.V.GANGAPURWALA, J.]
DDC
Jitendra Harishcandra Thakur
Divisional Commissioner
S.V. Gangapurwala
S.G. Dige
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court