Petitioner challenged termination of services as Police Patil seeking due process. Court noted subsequent re-appointment extended service till 2026 and dismissed the petition finding no reason to entertain it.
Petitioner's Writ Petition stands dismissed; no order on costs
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2 wp8992-17.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.8992 OF 2017
Shri Madhusudan Gajanan Sutar (Mestry)
….. Petitioner
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra and Anr. ….. Respondents
Mr.Prajakt M. Arjunwadkar for the Petitioner Mr.A.P.Vanarase, A.G.P. for the State
CORAM: K.K.TATED & RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, JJ. DATED : APRIL 07, 2021
P.C.
. Heard.
1/2/22
2 wp8992-17.odt
19.10.2020 appointing the Petitioner as Police Patil upto 30.04.2026 .
8. Hence, Writ Petition stands dismissed.
9. No order as to costs.
(RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, J.)
2/2
Mohite
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a Writ Petition for direction not to terminate services without natural justice should be entertained when the petitioner has been re-appointed subsequently?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shri Madhusudan Gajanan Sutar
The State of Maharashtra
K.K. TATED
Riyaz I. Chagla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
