of Electronic Industrial Instrumentation. As per his testimony every year he pays income tax upto Rs.60,000/-. The plaintiffs have fled the copies of income tax returns on record. At the time of incident the age of P.W.2 Vijay was only 27 years. Even the income of P.W.2 Vijay is considered as Rs.50,000/- per month then he could easily earn Rs.6,00,000/- per year. If he could work upto age of 60 years with his both eyes then he could earn huge income in his life i.e. more than Rs.3,00,000/- Crores by adding future prospects of 40%. The eye is vital organ in his body. Due to the loss of eye P.W.2 Vijay caused 30% disability to his body. Due to the loss of eye his working effciency will be naturally reduced. P.W.2 spent Rs.1,00,000/- on surgery of his right eye. Thereafter, also he continuously takes the follow up in the hospital. Hence, considering the pecuniary damages i.e. expenses relating to the treatment, hospitalization, medicine, loss of earnings which the injured could have made had he not been injured, loss of earning during the period of treatment, loss of future earnings on account of permanent disability, loss of future medical expenses and non-pecuniary damages i.e. damages for pain, suffering and trauma is the consequences of the injuries, loss of amenities, the compensation and damages of Rs.50,00,000/- with interest of 9% from the date of fling of the suit would be just and proper to meet the ends of justice.”
