Petitioner sought writ direction preventing termination as Police Patil without due process. Court dismissed petition as subsequent reappointment until 2026 rendered the case no longer maintainable.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2 wp8992-17.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.8992 OF 2017
Shri Madhusudan Gajanan Sutar (Mestry)
….. Petitioner
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra and Anr. ….. Respondents
Mr.Prajakt M. Arjunwadkar for the Petitioner Mr.A.P.Vanarase, A.G.P. for the State
CORAM: K.K.TATED & RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, JJ. DATED : APRIL 07, 2021
P.C.
. Heard.
1/2/22
2 wp8992-17.odt
19.10.2020 appointing the Petitioner as Police Patil upto 30.04.2026 .
8. Hence, Writ Petition stands dismissed.
9. No order as to costs.
(RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, J.)
2/2
Mohite
Shri Madhusudan Gajanan Sutar
The State of Maharashtra and Anr.
K.K.TATED
RIYAZ I. CHAGLA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
