Allowed

Surekha Bhaskar Gadge Decd Thru Lhrs v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Bombay HC6 Apr 2021IA/2973/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court allowed an interim application permitting the applicants to bring on record the legal heirs of the deceased sole petitioner in two writ petitions. The applicants were directed to complete the amendments by 30th April 2021 and serve amended copies.

What did the court decide?

Permission granted to bring on record the legal heirs of the deceased sole petitioner by 30th April 2021 in Writ Petitions No.8225 of 2009 and No.10652 of 2013.

Surekha Bhaskar Gadge Decd Thru Lhrs Vs State of… — Succession and Inheritance | Bombay HC (2021)

¶1

8-9-ia-2973-2975--2020.doc

¶2

jsn

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

INTERIM APPLICATION NO.2973 OF 2020

¶5

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO.8225 OF 2009 WITH

¶7

INTERIM APPLICATION NO.2975 OF 2020

¶8

¶9

WRIT PETITION NO.10652 OF 2013

¶10

Surekha Bhaskar Gadge & Ors. …Applicants / Petitioners

¶11

In the matter between

¶12

Bhaskar Mangal Gadge (Since deceased)

¶13

Versus

¶14

State of Maharashtra & Ors. …Respondents

¶15

Mr. Devmani Jagdish Shukla for the Applicants in both Writ Petitions.

¶16

Mr. A.I.Patel, Addl. G.P. with Mr. S.S. Panchpor, AGP for State in Writ Petition No.8225 of 2009.

¶17

Mr. Gurunath B. Walawalkar i/b. Shankar P. Thorat for the Respondent No.2 in both Writ Petitions.

¶18

Mr. Karan S Thorat, AGP for State in Writ Petition No.10652 of 2013.

¶19

CORAM : K.K. TATED & R.I. CHAGLA, JJ.

¶20

DATE : 6TH APRIL, 2021

¶21

1 / 3

¶22

8-9-ia-2973-2975--2020.doc

¶23

ORDER :

¶24

Heard learned Counsel for parties.

¶25

By these Interim Applications, the Applicants are seeking permission to bring on record the legal heirs of deceased sole Petitioner Bhaskar Mangal Gadge in both Petitions who expired on 28th January, 2020.

¶26

Learned Counsel for the Applicants submits that in the interest of justice the Hon’ble Court be pleased to permit the Applicants to carry out amendment by showing them legal heirs of deceased sole Petitioner. He submits that in any case the application fled within time.

¶27

Considering submissions made by learned Counsel for the Applicants and averments made in the Interim Applications, we are satisfed that the Applicants have made out case for allowing the Interim Applications. Hence the following order:-

¶28

a) The Applicants are permitted to bring on record the legal heirs of deceased sole Petitioner in Writ Petition No.8225 of 2009 and Writ Petition No.10652 of 2013 on or before 30th April, 2021.

¶29

2 / 3

¶30

8-9-ia-2973-2975--2020.doc

¶31

b) If the amendments are carried out within time, the Applicants are directed to serve amended copy of the Writ Petition on other side immediately thereafter.

¶32

c) Both the Interim Applications are disposed of. No order as to cost.

¶33

[R.I. CHAGLA J.]

¶34

[K.K. TATED, J.]

¶35

3 / 3

Surekha Bhaskar Gadge Decd Thru Lhrs v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Surekha Bhaskar Gadge Decd Thru Lhrs v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mrs.Lata Ramesh Gholap and Anr. Vs the District Magistrate, Appellate Tribunal of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Ors.

Vidyadhar Anant Pujari and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra through Principal Secretary and Ors.

Madan Sadashiv Edake and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra Thr. Principal Secretary School Education Dept. and Ors.

Shri. Vijay Vasantrai Gohil Vs M/S. Irb Infrastructure Developers Ltd. and Ors.

Bhaskar Mangal Gadge Decd Thru Lhrs Vs State of Maharashtra, through Principal Secretary, Rural Development Dept and Anr.

Deepak Anant Sawant Vs Municipal Corporation for Greater Mumbai and 11 Others